"First,
let's be clear about what philosophy and education do not (italics original)
amount to, what they do not offer in return:
philosophy and education do not amount to grades, diplomas, or the
byproducts of schooling." (A Primer on Philosophy & Education, p. 30)
Stop the
presses! If that sentence does not make
you slam on the brakes and realize how subversive Samuel Rocha's book is, I
don't know what will. Ask anybody. Students will tell you education is precisely
about grades and diplomas. Parents and
legislators will say that it is all about the byproduct, namely, a job.
Rocha not only
takes aim at this ultra-pragmatic view, but observes that it is pervasive
throughout our educational system.
"In many colleges and universities, there are students who care
more about being on the list of some person they hardly know (the Dean), based
on three numbers and decimal point (their grade point average), than they do
about anything else related to their studies.
Sadly, these people have been conditioned to feel and act this way in
previous schooling institutions and elsewhere, too. There has never been an infant who cared about
grades, awards, or credentials."
(pp. 30, 31)
Whoa, Nelly,
again! Rocha takes us right back to Plato's cave and the poor prisoners who award prizes for correctly guessing at shadows. One of the most challenging
classes I have had the pleasure to teach is Theory of Knowledge, a course
required for the International Baccalaureate diploma. Students in the IB program are at the top of
their academic game, but when they hit TOK, they get jarred from their routine
of what works. They know how to make an
A in all their other classes. They know
how the system works and how to work the system. Suddenly they find themselves in a class that
asks them to explore how they know what they know. Their concrete perception of the world gets a
bit fuzzy. I have watched honor roll
students struggle with this class because the boundaries were vague and I could
not tell them with the precision of their chemistry teacher how to achieve an
A. As a result, I have watched more than
one such student unravel.
This is not to
say that we should not care about grades at all, and Rocha concedes this. No one should try to earn a D. On the other hand, he suggests that "you
should not confuse this institutionalized process of grade-getting,
school-going, degree-worshipping, and job-seeking with what philosophy and
education have to offer you." (p.
31) While he admits that these things
are not trivial or unimportant, his point is simply that there is something
more to the enterprise than just these things, and he uses a powerful analogy
to make his point.
"It would
be like trying to fall in love and get married in order to pay lower
taxes," he writes. (p. 33) "[L]ower tax rates simply come as happy
accidents. Likewise, good grades come as
happy accidents, too." (pp. 33-34)
If making the
honor roll or landing a job is not the supreme goal of education, what is? It is that little thing that caused Pontius
Pilate to pause in wonder. Says Rocha,
"Read for the truth. Write and
speak to show what seems true. Ask
questions to get at what might be true.
Attend classes to seek the truth.
Do not settle for shallow, impoverished grades and cheap, degrading
rewards. Philosophy and education require
courage." (p. 34)
No comments:
Post a Comment
While I welcome thoughts relevant to discussions of education, comments that are vulgar, insulting, or in any way inappropriate will be deleted.